US Supreme Court rules against the FCC
The FCC is an independent US agency that is responsible for broadcast and television, among others. Their tasks include the distribution of transmission frequencies, checking the compliance with technical norms and also a content control of the American networks (including big channels such as ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX).
Most of the pay TV channels (HBO, Showtime, etc.) regulate themselves and don't need to apologetic about their program towards an outside board of censors. This makes it possible that they can show rude language, sex and violent content in their program while the other networks have to follow strict guidelines that are controlled and enforced by the FCC. Almost 10 years ago, the FCC introduced revised and stricter rules that also incorporated higher fines for offenses. 3 programs were punished by now.
Normally, most of the channels gave in when the FCC took action and imposed a penalty when they got a complaint. However, meanwhile those fines go in the million Dollar region and channels refuted to pay when the FCC demanded the money for programs that aired several years ago (but still fall into the time after the reform was passed). One of those cases found its way with two other incidents (the Billboard Music Awards dating from 2002 and 2003 because of obscene language during acceptance speeches) before the highest US court. The ABC network was sentenced to pay 1.4 million Dollars for airing one episode of the series NYPD Blue back in 2003. The reasoning behind this was:
This case was brought up in court along with the others and went through the official instances until it finally reached the US Supreme Court which is the highest entity in America. Finally, they reached a verdict. The result: ABC does not have to pay for the episode of NYPD Blue. Also, the two award shows were acquitted of the charges. The reason:
As can be seen in the reasoning, this is no fundamental judgment over the FCC and their often harshly criticised perception of moral decency. The court purposely avoided to take a position in the discussion about free speech (what also includes showing nudity) and the conflict surrounding the FCC. Instead, they justified the acquittal of the networks by stating that the FCC did not inform them on time about the altered rules.
Many critics think that the court acted cowardly because they did not include the FCC with their moral standards and their power to issue extremely high fines into their verdict. In the end, only one technical detail was relevant in 3 cases from years back.
For today's shows, the Supreme Court's verdict has no impact. Still, very strict rules and high fines can be applied if the networks show something that is deemed forbidden. This is not the end of self-censoring such as time delay for live shows or the abandonment of too much nudity.
Release: Jun 27, 2012 - Author: Bob - Translator: Mike Lowrey
Jun 22, 2017 The Bird with the Crystal Plumage by Arrow Video
Jun 22, 2017 Madhouse on Blu-ray
Jun 22, 2017 The Stendhal Syndrome by Blue Underground
Jun 22, 2017 The Lawnmower Man with Both Versions on Blu-ray
Jun 17, 2017 Transformers: The Last Knight with a Longer Cut?
Jun 17, 2017 Sony Starts Clean Version Initiative
Jun 17, 2017 Spider-Man 3 - Editor's Cut Released on Blu-ray
Jun 09, 2017 Just Before Dawn on Blu-ray in the UK
Jun 09, 2017 Event Horizon - No Extended Cut After All
Jun 09, 2017 Hellboy - Reboot About to Come